Skip to content
Bright Jackpot Studio

The Worst Games of the Year 2025, Based on Metacritic

At every turn, fans are quick to share their selections of the top titles of 2025. Yet, where are the stinkers, the failures? Let's take a moment to honor the absolute worst games of the year, according to the critical consensus on Metacritic. Are all of these games as disappointing as the ratings suggest? We shall see.

10. Nintendo Switch 2 Welcome Tour

Aggregate Score: 54/100, Audience Score: 3.4/10

First impressions to this showcase title were colored by its $9.99 price tag, with many expressing disappointment it wasn't a bundled game like similar console launches. Reviewer sentiment was quite mixed, from harsh disappointment to more generous takes that highlighted the polished software itself. In spite of the debate, the title proved to be a surprisingly robust seller during its launch month.

9. Rennsport

Aggregate Score: 53/100, Audience Score: 3.2/10

Billed as "more than a racing game," this simulation from studios in Germany and Poland received overwhelmingly poor reviews. Critics noted that the game felt unfinished in nearly every way, especially in a year packed with high-quality racing games. Ultimately, this disappointing sim was advised to be left on the shelf.

8. Bubsy in: The Purrfect Collection

Aggregate Score: 53/100, Audience Score: 8.6/10

To begin with: the confusing colon usage is a silly point of contention. This collection of retro Bubsy titles showcases a rude feline known for non-stop jokes. Critics observed that these games haven't aged well to begin with and have not improved with age. The surprisingly strong user score is a baffling contrast to the professional reviews.

7. Nen x Impact

Metascore: 53, Audience Score: 3.5

This anime-inspired fighter faced significant backlash from both reviewers and fans. It was lambasted for a thin roster of characters and a severe lack of gameplay modes. Player sentiment was particularly negative, with some stating a wish that the title's flop would have consequences for future projects.

6. Riders Vs Dogoos

Aggregate Score: 51, Audience Score: 5.3

A part of the anime-style Hyperdimension Neptunia series, this motorcycle action game tasks players with rounding up cute monsters. Critics argued that its effort to mimic a unique feel didn't land, coming across as more of a low-effort product than a substantial series entry. Its brief runtime combined with a $40 price tag raised eyebrows.

5. Captain Blood

Metascore: 50, User Score: 5.3

This title is a resurrected relic from the mid-2000s, finally released after years and years in development hell. The team behind it consciously chose to keep the game as an authentic artifact of its time, fully aware that contemporary players might not appreciate its old-school mechanics. As such, many reviews remarked that the interesting history of its development was far richer than the end product.

4. Scar-Lead

Metascore: 44, Audience Score: 2.4

This anime-art third-person shooter inspired by games like *Returnal* failed to impress with critics. The main issues centered on uninspired foes, repetitive levels, and a unengaging plot. A much-criticized system involving the protagonist's clothing was seen as adding nothing and detracted from the game's enjoyment.

3. Ambulance Life

Metascore: 44, Audience Score: 4.9

Think of the engaging medical sims of the past, then remove the satisfying gameplay. That, according to reviews, is pretty much *Ambulance Life*. Reviewers found the ambulance-driving sequences to be tedious and repetitive, and the story's portrayal of mental health topics was criticized as being poorly executed. The overall experience was deemed a missed opportunity.

2. Tamagotchi Plaza

Aggregate Score: 43, Audience Score: 5.8

This new direction for the classic virtual pet formula turns the franchise into a minigame collection title. The result, per critics, was a vapid series of basic activities that rapidly overstayed its welcome. Some reviews went so far as to label it one of the lowest-quality titles available on its platform, noting a complete absence of engaging content.

1. MindsEye

Aggregate Score: 37, User Score: 2.5

Arriving as a high-profile open-world action game from a studio led by well-known figures, *MindsEye* was a spectacular disappointment. Reviews heavily criticized its poor shooting mechanics, uninspired storytelling, and a multitude of horrendous bugs. Many found it to be a regression compared to previous-generation games in the same genre. Among the scathing reviews, a tiny number of optimistic players found fun in the experience, offering a lonely counterpoint.

The writer

Christopher Evans

A digital strategist with over a decade of experience in UX design and front-end development, passionate about creating user-centric solutions.

Bright Jackpot Studio

Type to search articles.